PHYSICS • COMPLEX SYSTEMS • SYMBOLIC COMPUTATION

Physics Says Witchcraft Is REAL:

How Spells, Prayer and Kabbalah Code Can Work

By Bill SerGio, Founder, Zero-Training AI, Inc.

I invented Zero-Training AI™—requiring no data and no training. I created AI-driven systems that generated hundreds of millions of dollars in sales. Listed in Marquis Who’s Who in America and Who’s Who in Advertising.

THE EXACT CLAIM

A ritual does not need to violate physics to change reality. It must enter a causal chain—and human beings are causal systems made of matter, energy, information, memory, meaning and choice.

Witchcraft is usually forced into a false choice. Either spells are meaningless theater, or they must be supernatural commands that suspend the laws of nature. Both positions miss the scientifically stronger possibility: structured ritual can be a lawful intervention in a living decision system.

Words, numbers, symbols, breath, posture, timing, music and repeated attention are physical events. They alter neural activity, autonomic state, memory retrieval, interpretation, commitment and social coordination. When those changes alter action, the external world can change through ordinary causal chains: a boundary is enforced, a danger is avoided, a call is made, help is organized, a negotiation turns, or persistence continues one iteration longer.

This article therefore uses the word real precisely. It does not claim that every incantation moves matter at a distance, that desire selects quantum outcomes, or that ritual replaces medicine. It argues that spells, prayer and Kabbalah Code can function as embodied algorithms: repeatable symbolic procedures capable of changing the state and trajectory of human systems without breaking physics.

1. What Does “Work” Mean?

“The spell worked” is not yet a scientific statement. The target, pathway and time window must be named. Ritual effects occupy four distinct levels, and each level requires a different experiment.

Internal — Changes in arousal, attention, pain, grief, confidence, perceived presence or emotional regulation.

Behavioral — Changes in choice, effort, inhibition, timing, persistence, preparation or follow-through.

Social — Changes in trust, speech, bonding, mutual aid, donations, group identity or coordinated action.

External — Events beyond the practitioner. Here science requires a traceable causal channel—or unusually strong, independently reproducible evidence if no channel is known.

This separation prevents the central category error. Evidence that prayer reduces a practitioner’s anxiety does not prove that prayer remotely heals an unaware stranger. Evidence that synchronized ritual increases cooperation does not prove that chanting changes a lottery number. Different claims require different controls.

EQUATION 1 — AVERAGE CAUSAL EFFECT

τ = E[Y | do(R = 1)] − E[Y | do(R = 0)]

R is assigned ritual participation and Y is a prespecified outcome. The do-operator distinguishes intervention from observation.

People who pray or practice ritual are not randomly selected. They can differ in health, community, culture, stress, resources and behavior. Randomization, credible controls, frozen outcomes and full reporting separate a causal effect from a story reconstructed afterward.

2. A Spell Is a Control Input

Strip away the theatrical packaging. A spell is a designed sequence of sensory and symbolic inputs: selected words, imagery, gesture, objects, rhythm, breathing, posture, timing and intention. In control language, the practitioner is a dynamical system and the ritual is an input capable of changing the system’s next state.

EQUATION 2 — STATE AND CONTROL

xₜ₊₁ = f(xₜ, uₜ, wₜ) and uₜ = π(xₜ; g, s, b)

x is the person’s state; u is ritual-guided input; w is disturbance; g is the goal; s is the symbol set; b is belief or learned meaning.

State is not metaphorical. It can include respiration, heart rate, muscle tension, accessible memory, attention, pain, emotion and readiness to act. The policy π turns state, goal, symbols and meaning into a sequence: breathe, repeat a phrase, visualize the target, retrieve an obligation, call an ally, refuse an impulse, or execute the planned action.

Civilization already depends on symbolic causation. A written order opens a valve because a technician interprets it. A contract transfers property because institutions recognize it. A password changes access because software maps symbols onto operations. Symbols do not possess free-floating force; they become causes when a physical interpreter changes state or action. Brains, bodies, technologies and communities are such interpreters.

EQUATION 4 — SENSITIVITY IN A SIMPLIFIED SERIAL MODEL

dY/dR = (dY/dS)(dS/dA)(dA/dΠ)(dΠ/dP)(dP/dM)(dM/dR)

This chain-rule form applies only to an idealized scalar, deterministic, single-path model. Real systems require multivariable or causal-mediation analysis.

The engineering lesson survives the qualification. If ritual changes no mediator—no attention, physiology, policy, action or coordination—then it has no route to the specified outcome. If one or more links are active, even a modest intervention can become consequential through feedback and thresholds.

3. Prayer Is Not One Hypothesis

Participatory prayer: the person praying is in the circuit

Here the physical channels are visible: language, breathing, posture, attention, autobiographical memory, expectation, emotional regulation and social cognition. Bernardi and colleagues found that rosary prayer and yoga mantras slowed respiration to approximately six cycles per minute and synchronized cardiovascular rhythms, including baroreflex-related oscillations.[1]

In an fMRI study, improvised personal prayer in highly religious Christians recruited medial prefrontal and other regions used in social cognition.[2] That finding does not place God inside a scanner. It establishes something operational: for the participant, personal prayer is processed as a meaningful exchange with an intentional other rather than as empty vocal noise.

Anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann has described how repeated prayer, absorption, trained imagination, narrative and disciplined attention can make an invisible presence experientially vivid.[15–16] A cultivated experience can be psychologically real, behaviorally potent and spiritually meaningful without a brain-imaging experiment deciding the metaphysical status of its object.

Collective prayer: many people know they are participating

Collective prayer opens high-bandwidth ordinary channels: shared speech, synchronized timing, emotional contagion, identity, public commitment, caregiving, messaging, donations, volunteering and institutional action. If thousands pray for disaster victims and the same gathering moves shelter, food, blood, money and political attention, the ritual has entered the world through a human network.

The most relevant evidence comes from the broader science of synchrony and collective ritual. Wiltermuth and Heath found that synchronized activity increased later cooperation, even when cooperation carried a cost.[5] Konvalinka and colleagues measured synchronized arousal between fire-walkers and closely related spectators.[6] Xygalatas and colleagues found that participation in—and observation of—an extreme ritual predicted greater prosocial giving.[7] These studies did not directly test mass prayer, but they establish plausible mechanisms by which shared ritual couples bodies, identities and behavior.

EQUATION 6 — COUPLED AGENTS

zᵢ(t+1) = φ[azᵢ(t) + b∑ⱼ Aᵢⱼzⱼ(t) + cmᵢ(t) + εᵢ(t)]

zᵢ is person i’s state; Aᵢⱼ is the social network; mᵢ is the shared message; b represents interpersonal coupling.

EQUATION 7 — KURAMOTO ORDER PARAMETER

r eⁱᶿ = (1/N) ∑ⱼ eⁱᶿʲ, 0 ≤ r ≤ 1

r near 0 indicates dispersed phases; r near 1 indicates strong synchrony. This models coordination—not supernatural voltage.

The strongest scientifically supported meaning of “mass prayer works” is therefore not that N minds amplify an invisible beam. It is that shared ritual can increase coherence among people, and coherent people can mobilize attention, resources and action more effectively. That is a social-dynamics claim—and it is powerful enough without inventing a paranormal field.

Distant intercession: the recipient is unaware

This is the hardest claim because it removes known psychological and social mediators. Harris and colleagues reported an improvement in a weighted coronary-care course score, although length of stay did not differ.[8] That result deserves acknowledgment, but a new force of nature cannot be built on a disputed composite outcome.

The multicenter STEP trial randomized 1,802 coronary-bypass patients. Among patients uncertain whether they would receive prayer, complications occurred in 52% of those prayed for and 51% of those not prayed for: relative risk 1.02, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.92 to 1.15. Intercessory prayer itself did not improve complication-free recovery. Patients certain that they would receive prayer experienced more complications than uncertain recipients.[9]

A Cochrane review found no clear effect on death, clinical state, readmission or rehospitalization.[10] A separate meta-analysis concluded that controlled studies showed no scientifically discernible distant-intercession effect.[11] The careful conclusion is not “prayer does nothing.” It is narrower: controlled medical trials have not established a reliable direct effect on unaware recipients when ordinary causal channels are removed.

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS

Prayer can alter the person praying, regulate breathing and attention, structure coping and meaning, and coordinate communities. A reproducible dose-dependent remote medical effect bypassing every known physical and social channel has not been established.

4. Meaning Is a Physical Input

Calling an effect “placebo” is often used as a dismissal. That is a category error. A placebo contains no specific active drug for the target condition, yet expectancy, conditioning and context can still recruit real neural and physiological mechanisms. Placebo analgesia has been associated with decreased activity in pain-sensitive regions and increased anticipatory activity in prefrontal regions.[3] Benedetti and colleagues demonstrated different placebo and nocebo responses driven by conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning across pain, motor and hormonal systems.[4]

Belief does not act because it is exempt from matter. Belief is an informational and functional state instantiated in a nervous system. It changes which signals receive attention, how ambiguous sensations are interpreted, which actions are prepared and what feedback is learned.

EQUATION 8 — BAYESIAN UPDATING

P(h | d) = P(d | h)P(h) / P(d)

Ritual can alter priors, attention and the evidence sampled through subsequent action. This is a model of inference, not proof that every ritual belief is true.

A protection spell need not violate electrodynamics. It may reduce panic, sharpen vigilance, reinforce a boundary and increase the probability of leaving a dangerous room. The candle is not a force field. The structured act changes the agent who must confront the danger—and that agent may be the decisive lever.

5. Chaos Amplifies Action; It Does Not Transmit Wishes

In chaotic dynamics, nearby trajectories can separate exponentially over a finite interval. The approximation is local: divergence does not literally grow without limit, because nonlinearities, bounded attractors and physical constraints eventually dominate.

EQUATION 10 — FINITE-TIME SENSITIVE DEPENDENCE

‖δx(t)‖ ≈ ‖δx(0)‖e^(λt), λ > 0

Valid while the perturbation remains in the local linear regime. A positive Lyapunov exponent indicates sensitive dependence in the modeled system.

Nor should every marriage, career or negotiation be casually declared a mathematically proven chaotic system. The article requires only the more general—and well-established—features of nonlinear human environments: feedback, thresholds, network effects, path dependence and timing sensitivity.

The butterfly effect is an amplifier, not a radio. A wish that never changes state or action has not entered the external dynamics. A thought that produces one earlier message, one different tone, one additional attempt or one refusal to quit has become a physical perturbation. If it reaches a threshold, the downstream result may look discontinuous. From outside, it looks magical. From inside the causal map, it is lawful amplification.

6. Why Kabbalah Deserves a Separate Scientific Approach

Kabbalah should not be reduced to a single claim about fortune-telling or to modern “Bible code” controversies. It is a much older symbolic architecture built from letters, numbers, names, permutations, levels and relations. Sefer Yetzirah opens with thirty-two paths of wisdom: ten sefirot and twenty-two foundational Hebrew letters.[12] Whatever one’s theology, this is recognizably a formal system—a finite alphabet, a set of distinctions and an organized space of transformations.

THE KABBALISTIC PROPOSITION

Reality is not exhausted by isolated objects. Pattern, relation, number, name, transformation and level also matter. Modern physics does not settle Kabbalah’s spiritual claims; it confirms the broader principle that deep physical structure can be encoded mathematically.

Remarkable anticipations in the Kabbalistic record

Supporters of Kabbalah frequently point to passages whose correspondence with later developments is striking. One Zohar passage describes the inhabited world as turning in a circle like a ball, with people standing in different orientations, daylight in one region while another is dark, and a place where daylight persists for nearly the entire day.[13] A separate Zohar passage associates the year 600 of the sixth millennium—approximately 1840—with the opening of “wellsprings of wisdom” below, a line often read against the extraordinary scientific and technological acceleration of the nineteenth century.[14]

These passages were not written as twenty-first-century preregistered forecasts and should not be forced into that category. They belong to a different evidentiary class: historical anticipations—textual statements preserved before the later developments with which readers see correspondence. Their status is interpretive rather than experimental, but that makes them a separate subject for serious investigation, not something meaningless.

The historical order itself matters. Kabbalistic texts were already treating creation through number, letter, relation, permutation and layered structure centuries before field theory, information theory or network science supplied modern technical vocabulary for those ideas. That is not identity between Kabbalah and physics. It is a profound structural resonance deserving study on its own terms.

Historical anticipation, spiritual interpretation, psychological efficacy and prospective prediction are four different questions. Kabbalah deserves investigation on all four levels, with methods appropriate to each.

Numbers are not decorations in physics

Physics does not merely use numbers to keep score. Numbers specify the invariant relationships that decide which worlds are physically possible. A dimensionless constant can determine interaction strength. An eigenvalue can decide whether a mode grows, decays or oscillates. A symmetry can imply a conserved quantity. A topological integer can distinguish phases of matter that cannot be smoothly deformed into one another.

EQUATION 11 — A DIMENSIONLESS NUMBER GOVERNING INTERACTION

α = e²/(4πε₀ℏc) ≈ 1/137.035999

The fine-structure constant is a pure number measuring electromagnetic coupling. Its existence shows that number can encode a fundamental relation; it does not validate arbitrary numerology.[18]

EQUATION 12 — SYMMETRY PRODUCES CONSERVATION

δS = 0 under a continuous symmetry ⇒ ∂μjᵘ = 0

Noether’s theorem connects invariance of the action with a conserved current. Structure—not visual resemblance—is what carries physical meaning.[17]

This is the disciplined bridge to Kabbalah. Physics does not say that every numerical coincidence is a law. It says something subtler and more important: when a mapping is stable, a transformation is defined and an invariant survives change, number reveals structure that ordinary description can miss.

Kabbalah Code as symbolic computation

Gematria begins with a deterministic map from letters to numbers. Kabbalistic analysis then examines sums, equivalences, substitutions, permutations, reductions and relational patterns. The mathematics does not decide the spiritual meaning. It makes the transformation explicit, repeatable and auditable.

EQUATION 14 — GEMATRIA TRANSFORM

G(w) = ∑ᵢ g(cᵢ)

A word w is composed of characters cᵢ; g assigns each character a fixed numerical value. The mapping must be declared before interpretation.

EQUATION 15 — A MULTIDIMENSIONAL KABBALAH SIGNATURE

K(w) = [G(w), dr(G), G mod m₁, …, G mod mₖ, T₁(w), …, Tₙ(w)]

A symbolic object can be represented by a reproducible vector of totals, reductions, residues and declared transformations—not by one cherry-picked number.

EQUATION 16 — RELATIONAL GRAPH

Cᵢⱼ = κ[K(wᵢ), K(wⱼ)]

κ is a declared relation rule. The matrix C converts symbolic correspondences into a graph that can be inspected, compared and tested.

This provides a stronger way to understand Kabbalah Code. It is not merely a hunt for lucky numbers. It is a symbolic coordinate system: a method for converting language into structured relations, then using those relations to focus interpretation, memory, intention and decision. Its external effects still require a causal channel, but the code itself can be exact.

Information theory makes the distinction clear. A pattern is informative only relative to a defined probability model; surprise alone is not proof. Yet a symbol can carry enormous causal power once an interpreter and a rule system exist—the difference between meaningless marks and a command, a contract, a sacred obligation or an executable instruction.

EQUATION 17 — INFORMATION AND UNCERTAINTY

I(x) = −log₂P(x) and H(X) = −∑ₓ P(x)log₂P(x)

Information is defined relative to a model. Kabbalistic significance and statistical rarity are related questions, but they are not automatically the same question.

A STRONG CLAIM FOR KABBALAH CODE

Kabbalah offers a disciplined language of number, relation and transformation. Physics establishes that lawful reality is deeply mathematical; cognitive science establishes that interpreted symbols can reorganize human state and action. Kabbalah Code stands at that intersection and deserves its own program of historical, experiential and experimental study.

Learn more about the physics of Kabbalah at KabbalahCode.com

7. The Quantum Boundary: Mystery Is Not a Mechanism

Quantum mechanics is probabilistic, counterintuitive and genuinely nonclassical. None of those words provides a blank check for an unspecified causal story. Closed-system evolution remains governed by the Schrödinger equation, and measurement probabilities remain governed by the Born rule.

EQUATION 18 — QUANTUM EVOLUTION AND MEASUREMENT

iℏ ∂|ψ(t)⟩/∂t = Ĥ|ψ(t)⟩ and P(aᵢ) = |⟨aᵢ|ψ⟩|²

These equations contain no general term by which human desire selects a preferred eigenstate. A claimed effect requires a defined interaction.

Entanglement produces nonclassical correlations, but the no-signaling principle prevents those correlations from becoming a controllable faster-than-light message.[19] Environmental decoherence suppresses observable interference between macroscopic alternatives.[20] Consciousness remains important because conscious organisms perceive, model and act—not because the word quantum licenses remote control of matter.

The correct physics is richer than counterfeit quantum mysticism. A spoken prayer becomes pressure waves, neural firing, altered breathing, recalled commitments and communication. A repeatedly viewed sigil becomes retinal input and a retrieval cue. A shared code becomes a coordination protocol. Information has effects when it is physically instantiated and processed.

EQUATION 19 — LOCAL CONSERVATION

∂μTᵘᵛ = 0 (flat spacetime); ∇μTᵘᵛ = 0 (general relativity)

Energy–momentum conservation must be stated in the geometry being used. Causal influence must ride on lawful interaction.

8. A Complete Model of Ritual Efficacy

The useful model is neither “mere superstition” nor unrestricted “mind over matter.” It is layered causation.

Encoding — A goal becomes words, numbers, symbols, gestures, timing and sensory cues.

Attention — Competing demands are suppressed and goal-relevant information is repeatedly sampled.

Appraisal — The ritual assigns meaning, expectancy, threat, hope, duty or sacred value.

Physiology — Breathing, arousal, autonomic tone, pain modulation and motor readiness may change.

Policy — Decision thresholds, habits and the likelihood of particular actions change.

Interaction — Speech, timing, persistence, help, avoidance and coordination alter the environment.

Feedback — Consequences update belief and future behavior; reinforcement or extinction follows.

EQUATION 20 — EXPECTED OUTCOME UNDER INTERVENTION

E[Y | do(R=r)] = ∫ E[Y | a,s,e,x,r] p(a,s,e,x | do(R=r)) da ds de dx

Ritual can alter outcome Y through internal state x, action a, social response s and exposure e. The full joint distribution prevents an omitted-variable integral.

This model explains failure as well as success. The same ritual may steady one person, do nothing for another and harm a third. Effects depend on prior learning, belief, trauma, context, target, generated action and environmental feedback. Ritual is not automatically benevolent; it can concentrate courage, or it can concentrate fear, compulsion, prejudice and passivity.

9. How to Test a Spell, Prayer or Code

Specify the target — Choose one primary outcome, one measurement scale and one time window.

Specify the mechanism — State whether the proposed channel is autonomic, attentional, behavioral, social or allegedly nonlocal.

Freeze the system — Declare the ritual, text, number mapping, transformations, sample size, exclusions and analysis before looking at results.

Use the right control — Compare with matched breathing, neutral repetition, an alternative symbol system, sham ritual, silence or usual care.

Blind where possible — Outcome assessors should not know assignment. Tests of distant intercession require concealment from recipients.

Measure mediators — Track respiration, heart-rate variability, attention, expectancy, affect, adherence, contact, helping and resource movement.

Correct multiplicity — Every outcome, subgroup, spelling, numerical mapping, time point and model examined contributes to the search space.

Replicate — Use a new team, a frozen protocol and held-out cases.

EQUATION 22 — AT LEAST ONE CHANCE HIT

P(K ≥ 1) = 1 − (1 − p)ᴹ ≈ 1 − e^(−Mp)

The independence formula gives about 0.99995 for M = 10,000 and p = 0.001. The shortcut Mp is not a valid probability when Mp is not much smaller than 1.

10. What This Framework Establishes—and What It Does Not

What it establishes

Symbolic causation — Symbols are not inert when interpreted by brains, bodies, technologies or institutions.

Prayer and physiology — Prayer and rhythmic recitation can change breathing and measurable autonomic dynamics.

Meaning and the brain — Personal prayer can recruit systems involved in social cognition, meaning and expectation.

Collective ritual — Synchrony and shared ritual can influence attachment, cooperation and prosocial behavior.

Nonlinear amplification — Action changes can be amplified by feedback, thresholds, networks and timing.

Kabbalistic structure — Kabbalistic operations can be specified as numerical and symbolic transformations, compared as relational graphs and studied without reducing their spiritual meaning to one laboratory variable.

What it does not establish

Universal success — Not every spell works, and subjective certainty alone is not evidence of external causation.

Remote medicine — Distant prayer has not demonstrated a reliable clinical effect on unaware recipients.

Quantum selection — No accepted mechanism allows desire to select preferred quantum outcomes at will or signal through entanglement.

Automatic numerical truth — A numerical correspondence can be spiritually meaningful without automatically being statistically rare or physically causal.

Replacement of care — Prayer, ritual and Kabbalah Code should not replace medical diagnosis, treatment, emergency action or other evidence-based care.

Conclusion: Real Causation Does Not Need Broken Physics

A spell can be real without being a crime against nature. A prayer can carry power without functioning as a remote-control signal. Kabbalah Code can be consequential without being reduced either to superstition or to a crude claim that every numerical coincidence predicts the future. Their common element is structured meaning embodied in a physical system.

Ritual gives form to an intention that would otherwise remain diffuse: word, number, sequence, rhythm, symbol, witness, repetition and obligation. Form changes attention. Attention changes appraisal. Appraisal changes physiology and choice. Choice changes action. Coordinated action changes networks. In nonlinear environments, modest differences can grow until the future looks discontinuous.

That is not “nothing but psychology.” Psychology is what organized matter does when it perceives, predicts, values and acts. Nor is it permission to paste quantum terminology onto an untested claim. The strongest case is the one that survives measurement: spells and prayer can act as embodied control procedures, while Kabbalah supplies an unusually deep architecture of symbol, number, relation and transformation deserving its own scientific and philosophical investigation.

You already live inside such a system. Markets, relationships, negotiations, recoveries and missions are decision surfaces. A small, coherent, repeated intervention applied at the right coordinate can change the path. That is applied dynamics—and it belongs to the same family of ideas behind Zero-Training AI™, where intelligence begins by writing the dimensions, constraints and lawful action rather than swallowing a mountain of training data.

THE FINAL PROPOSITION

Witchcraft, prayer and Kabbalah Code do not have to break physics to change reality. They have to become structured information, enter a living causal system and alter what happens next.

Explore the symbolic and numerical framework at KabbalahCode.com

Scientific and medical note: This article presents a mechanistic framework and research summary, not medical advice. Prayer, ritual and symbolic practice may be used alongside—but must not replace—qualified diagnosis, treatment or emergency care.

References

1. Bernardi L, Sleight P, Bandinelli G, et al. Effect of rosary prayer and yoga mantras on autonomic cardiovascular rhythms: comparative study. BMJ. 2001;323:1446–1449. Source

2. Schjoedt U, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, Geertz AW, Roepstorff A. Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2009;4(2):199–207. Source

3. Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, et al. Placebo-induced changes in fMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science. 2004;303(5661):1162–1167. Source

4. Benedetti F, Pollo A, Lopiano L, et al. Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor, and hormonal placebo/nocebo responses. Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;23(10):4315–4323. Source

5. Wiltermuth SS, Heath C. Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science. 2009;20(1):1–5. Source

6. Konvalinka I, Xygalatas D, Bulbulia J, et al. Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. PNAS. 2011;108(20):8514–8519. Source

7. Xygalatas D, Mitkidis P, Fischer R, et al. Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science. 2013;24(8):1602–1605. Source

8. Harris WS, Gowda M, Kolb JW, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of remote intercessory prayer in coronary care. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1999;159(19):2273–2278. Source

9. Benson H, Dusek JA, Sherwood JB, et al. Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP). American Heart Journal. 2006;151(4):934–942. Source

10. Roberts L, Ahmed I, Hall S, Davison A. Intercessory prayer for the alleviation of ill health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;(2):CD000368. Source

11. Masters KS, Spielmans GI. Prayer and health: review, meta-analysis, and research agenda. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2007;30(4):329–338. Source

12. Sefer Yetzirah 1:1. Thirty-two paths: ten sefirot and twenty-two foundational letters. Source

13. Zohar, Vayikra 10a. Passage describing the inhabited world as spherical, with simultaneous day and night in different regions. Source

14. Zohar I:117a, traditionally interpreted in relation to the year 5600/approximately 1840 and an opening of earthly wisdom. Source

15. Luhrmann TM. Making God real and making God good: mechanisms through which prayer may contribute to healing. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2013;50(5):707–725. Source

16. Luhrmann TM. How God Becomes Real: Kindling the Presence of Invisible Others. Princeton University Press; 2020. Source

17. Noether E. Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. 1918:235–257. Source

18. National Institute of Standards and Technology. The fine-structure constant and CODATA recommended value. Source

19. De Angelis T, Nagali E, Sciarrino F, De Martini F. Experimental test of the no-signaling theorem. Physical Review Letters. 2007;99:193601. Source

20. Schlosshauer M. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2005;76:1267–1305. Source